Skip to main content

Can You Really Trust Your Fitness Tracker? A Functional Medicine Perspective
September 2, 2025 at 12:00 AM
website cover (20).jpg

Fitness trackers have become part of daily life for many of us. From counting steps to tracking heart rate, sleep, and even stress, these devices promise a window into our health. But how precise are they—and can we truly depend on them for health decisions?

What Fitness Trackers Get Right

Research suggests that fitness trackers are generally reliable for step counting and physical activity monitoring. A review published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth found that most wearable devices are accurate for step counts and activity duration, making them great for encouraging movement and accountability (Evenson et al., 2015).

Heart rate monitoring has also improved significantly in recent years. Studies show that trackers using photoplethysmography (the green-light sensors on your wrist) are fairly accurate during rest and moderate exercise (Wallen et al., 2016). This makes them useful for tracking general cardiovascular trends.

Where Fitness Trackers May Fall Short

While fitness trackers are excellent motivators, they aren’t perfect medical devices. Accuracy decreases with vigorous activity (such as sprinting or weightlifting) when motion can interfere with sensors (Boudreaux et al., 2018). Calorie estimates are also less precise, with many devices over- or underestimating energy expenditure (Shcherbina et al., 2017).

Sleep tracking is another area where caution is needed. While trackers can distinguish between sleep and wake states fairly well, they may not accurately detect deeper sleep stages (de Zambotti et al., 2019). This means your tracker might show you slept “deeply” when in reality, it’s only estimating based on movement and heart rate patterns.

blog illustrations ((narrow) (18).jpg

How to Use Them Wisely

From a Functional Medicine perspective, fitness trackers can be powerful tools for self-awareness, but they shouldn’t replace medical evaluation or personalized health care. Think of them as “wellness companions” rather than diagnostic instruments.

Here are some practical tips:

  • Look for trends, not perfection. Focus on patterns over time (e.g., your step count increasing weekly) instead of obsessing over daily fluctuations.
  • Pair with body awareness. If your tracker says you slept well but you feel exhausted, listen to your body first.
  • Use them as motivation, not measurement. The real value lies in how these devices inspire healthier habits—more movement, better sleep hygiene, and mindful living.

The Bottom Line

Fitness trackers offer useful, though not flawless, insights into daily activity, heart rate, and sleep. They’re most effective when used as guides rather than absolute authorities. Combining the data from your device with how you actually feel—and with professional guidance when needed—creates the best approach to supporting long-term health.

At Radiant Health & Wellness, we see technology as a partner, not a substitute, in your journey toward vitality. The most important data point is still you.

Sources:

  • Evenson KR, Goto MM, Furberg RD. (2015). Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. JMIR mHealth and uHealth.
  • Wallen MP et al. (2016). Accuracy of heart rate watches: Validation study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth.
  • Boudreaux BD et al. (2018). Validity of wearable activity monitors during step counting, physical activity, and exercise. JMIR mHealth and uHealth.
  • Shcherbina A et al. (2017). Accuracy in wearable metabolic estimates of energy expenditure. Journal of Personalized Medicine.
  • de Zambotti M et al. (2019). Wearable sleep technology in clinical and research settings. Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine.

Let's talk
We would love to hear from you!